English
a11yglass · Accessibility check for websites

Checked 9/3/2026 · https://vercel.com/

C
64 / 100
2 critical · 0 to check

2 critical barriern.

How is the score formed? (100 starting points)
Zoom is locked-18
5 CSS rulen with possibly too low text contrast-18
Result64 / 100
Contrast (1)Text alternativesLabellingStructureLanguageZoom (1)Robustness

Perceivable

CriticalWCAG 1.4.4 Resize Text / 1.4.10 Reflow

Zoom is locked

The viewport meta contains user-scalable=no or a maximum-scale close to 1.

<meta name="viewport">

This is what you should do: Remove user-scalable=no and maximum-scale: <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">.

CriticalWCAG 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum)

5 CSS rulen with possibly too low text contrast

Required: 4.5:1 (normal) or 3:1 (large text). With an “assumed page background” the actual background could not be determined reliably — check in the browser if in doubt. Found among others: `.text-\[rgb\(250\`: #fafafa auf #fafafa (Vorfahren-Hintergrund) = 1.00:1 · `.text-\[\#a0a0a0\]`: #a0a0a0 auf #ffffff (Standard) (Seitenhintergrund, angenommen) = 2.61:1 · `.text-\[\#33b279\]`: #33b279 auf #ffffff (Standard) (Seitenhintergrund, angenommen) = 2.70:1 · `.text-\[rgb\(29\`: #1d9bf0 auf #ffffff (Standard) (Seitenhintergrund, angenommen) = 3.00:1 · `.ghfe_a_dialog .ghfe_a_dialogcta`: #718900 auf #ffffff (Standard) (Seitenhintergrund, angenommen) = 3.98:1

.text-\[rgb\(250\, .text-\[\#a0a0a0\], .text-\[\#33b279\], .text-\[rgb\(29\, .ghfe_a_dialog .ghfe_a_dialogcta

This is what you should do: Darken the text colour or lighten the background until the relevant minimum value is reached. Never use colour as the only distinguishing feature.

Already handled correctly

Next steps

  1. Zoom is locked. Remove user-scalable=no and maximum-scale: <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">.
  2. 5 CSS rulen with possibly too low text contrast. Darken the text colour or lighten the background until the relevant minimum value is reached. Never use colour as the only distinguishing feature.
Monitor this page automatically?

Weekly re-scan, JS-rendered, email on new barriers — coming soon.

Create an accessibility statement →

Method & limits

On 9/3/2026 the HTML that vercel.com delivers on a first visit without login was checked, plus up to four linked CSS files from the same domain. Checked: colour contrast (from CSS), text alternatives, form labelling, names of controls, heading structure, page title and page language, zoom lock, duplicate ids, positive tabindex values, landmarks.

Not checked: anything that arises via JavaScript, keyboard operability, visible focus, focus order, screen-reader announcement, content behind login, subpages. The automated test finds roughly 20–35% of WCAG breaches — the rest needs a manual check. A snapshot, not a legal decision.

Check another website