Checked 9/2/2026 · https://example.com/
No automatically recognisable barriers were found in the checked HTML.
Since the previous scan: no change.
No findings by principle.
Already handled correctly
- Contrast: no unambiguous breaches found in the CSS
Weekly re-scan, JS-rendered, email on new barriers — coming soon.
Create an accessibility statement →
Method & limits
On 9/2/2026 the HTML that example.com delivers on a first visit without login was checked, plus up to four linked CSS files from the same domain. Checked: colour contrast (from CSS), text alternatives, form labelling, names of controls, heading structure, page title and page language, zoom lock, duplicate ids, positive tabindex values, landmarks.
Not checked: anything that arises via JavaScript, keyboard operability, visible focus, focus order, screen-reader announcement, content behind login, subpages. The automated test finds roughly 20–35% of WCAG breaches — the rest needs a manual check. A snapshot, not a legal decision.